Thursday, September 23, 2010

Poem about Chinatown -- not the ID

Nobody gives a shit about us





The high walls I cannot scale


( with apologies to Tu Fu )



Desolate in my Chinatown morning,
among the scraps and people sleeping in urine
doorways, I ache from the politics of the heart.

Pigeons flock together in Hing Hay Park,
no children to greet them.
I walk for my sanity, since alone in my room
before dawn, the mind constructs improbable things.

The city is humming for profits
and I wait for the porridge place to open.
A bowl of sampan porridge
adorned with a clump of watercress.

These Chinese and I are one, scattered
in the four corners of the globe.
I only have enough to pay for one bowl
and so sorry, my friend, I must dine alone.


Koon Woon
2012 18th Ave. South
Seattle, WA 98144-4324
August 5, 2005
(206) 329 - 5566

Homeless in Seattle

Homeless in Seattle

Real Change is phony change

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Ain't that the truth! Ain't that the pits!



Koon,

Thank you for your offer to read a poem at the event.  However after checking with Tim, we have to decline as the program is very full and we do not have the capacity to add anymore speakers.  

Katie

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:37 PM, <nooknoow@aol.com> wrote:
Tim,

Do you think I can read a poem to the audience at the Breakfast?

Best wishes,
Koon



-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Harris, Real Change <director@realchangenews.org>
To: nooknoow <nooknoow@aol.com>
Sent: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 9:52 pm
Subject: McGinn is in: Register now for your free Real Change breakfast ticket.

Real Change
Dear Koon,
Believe it or not, there are still hot spots available at the 16th Annual Real Change breakfast, just a week away! 

It's turning out to be the place to be September 30th- Mayor Mike McGinn is joining in as a special guest speaker.  And the guest list is getting longer and longer.  Confirmed guests include Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, Pete Holmes, City Attorney, Larry Gossett from the King County Council; and City Council Members Nick Licata, Tim Burgess, Mike O'Brien and many other local heavy lifters. 
We never figured on the Real Change breakfast guest list reading like a Who's Who guide to Seattle political power but we could not be more pleased to attract broadbased, grassroots support for our work.  We want you to join in and register today.  Send a quick email to register@realchangenews.org in order to save your seat.  How much you ask?  No ticket price in advance.  Simply register now and show up prepared to make a personally significant investment in Real Change during our special ask.  We need 500 friends in the room to reach our goal of $100,000.  
More details:

Thursday, September 30th
Fisher Pavilion at Seattle Center
7AM - Check-in and Networking 
7:30AM - Program
The breakfast, which will take place my 50th Birthday, will gather a handful of our oldest friends to recall highlights of our 16-year history as they roast me over medium-hot coals.  These include:
 
Nancy Guppy (emcee), comedienne, "Almost Live"
Joe Martin, Social Worker, Pike Place Medical Center
Peter Steinbrueck, former Seattle City Councilmember
Linda Weedman, King County Housing Authority
Ed McClain, 15-year U-District Real Change vendor
Jon Gould, Deputy Director, Children's Alliance

Vendors of the Year Mike Hall (Vendor at Elliot Bay Books) and Susan McRoy (Vendor at Madison Market) will be honored and celebrated as the 2010 Vendors of the year.  Finally, Seattle City Councilmember Nick Licata will be honored as our 2010 Change Agent for his courageous, progressive, leadership for social justice on the City Council.
Concluding the event will be guests who are so special and so surprize, my staff isn't even letting me in on the secret.  All in all, it will be a lot of fun.  It would mean a lot if your would join us.  Remember, email register@realchangenews.org now to save your seat.
 
Thank you for your support and I hope to see you there.  
Timothy Harris
Executive Director
Real Change
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe
empowered by Salsa



--
Kathleen Porch
Development Manager
Real Change Homeless Empowerment Project

Help set the table!  Join Real Change on September 30th, 7:00AM, at Fisher Pavilion in the Seattle Center for our 16th Annual Breakfast and 50th Birthday Roast of Founding Director Timothy Harris.  Hosted by Seattle Comedienne Nancy Guppy and featuring a motley crew of roasters including former City Council President Peter Steinbrueck, Jon Gould, Joe Martin and more.  Talk to me about registering as a Table Captain or guest.  Email:  register@realchangenews.org

p. (206) 441-3247 x201
www.realchangenews.org

I check email periodically between 8AM-5PM Monday-Friday. 

Monday, September 20, 2010

The End of Surface Battleship Power

Missiles will render surface battleships obsolete --- its implication is clear for the US Navy




Poll Topic
  This topic has been sticky by szh at 2010-9-20 11:03. 

Future sea war will unfold between subs only?

The era of surface warships will end?


Improved Nimitz class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier


For centuries, battleships ruled the seas. Whoever had the biggest, baddest battleships with the most powerful cannons controlled valuable shipping lines and thus dominated much of the world. This was true throughout the centuries of the sailing ship, the brief era of the steamship, and finally the epoch of the diesel-powered ship.


Just as manned aircraft suddenly rendered once-mighty battleships obsolete, we are now on the cusp of a new era in which all surface warfare ships will become obsolete. It has not happened yet, but the handwriting is clearly on the wall. Soon they will become indefensible. Why? Because ships are expensive and manned, while missiles are cheap and unmanned. Also, satellites are rapidly making every inch of the Earth viewable with the click of a mouse. In the near future, there will be literally nowhere to hide.


Ships: Expensive and Manned


Ships are expensive, and they take years to build. Consider the current Gerald R. Ford–class supercarrier under construction. It is going to cost somewhere around $9 billion and take 5 years to construct. Once launched, at any given time it will have around 100 aircraft on board. At a conservative estimate of $50 million per aircraft, that makes the carrier worth another $5 billion. More important than the equipment is the manpower. It will take about 3,000 Sailors and pilots to man the ship and the planes. So, adding it all up, we will have an asset worth about $14 billion floating around in the middle of the ocean with thousands of American lives on board.




Tarawa-class amphibious assault ship


Or let's consider one of the Tarawa-class amphibious assault ships used to bring Marines ashore. Each one costs around $2 billion and can carry 30 helicopters. In the future, they will carry the F–35 Lightning jets that can be modified for vertical takeoff. Each ship carries almost 2,000 Marines and a crew of about 1,000 Sailors and officers. So here again we see a multibillion-dollar platform out at sea with thousands of American Servicemembers aboard. Either of the above would clearly be a juicy target for an enemy nation or a terrorist organization.


Missiles: Cheap and Unmanned


A variety of antiship and ballistic missiles are available in the $1-million-each neighborhood. More primitive ones are much cheaper. Using $1 million as a round figure means that we could buy 2,000 missiles for $2 billion.


Along with being cheap, another key point is that missiles are unmanned—so we do not have to spend years training someone how to fly them. And we need not worry about pilots being killed or captured. If a few dozen or a hundred of them miss the target and plunge into the ocean, it is not a problem.


Adding up these factors, what other conclusion can we arrive at than that missiles can be purchased (or manufactured) in such vast quantities that a barrage of them could destroy any ship on the high seas, no matter how big or how technologically advanced.


Satellites Change Everything



Some may say: "But missiles have been around for decades. If this danger is so great, why hasn't this already happened?"


One reason is simple. As big as aircraft carriers are, they still can be hard to find out in the oceans. During World War II, for instance, the range of a Hellcat fighter jet was about 1,000 miles. This meant the carrier group had reconnaissance capability out to about 500 miles in any direction.


Today, satellites have changed all this. Soon every inch of the Earth's oceans will be visible by satellite. It will be a simple matter to find the exact grid coordinates of any ship anywhere in the world, punch the data into a missile silo, and launch a barrage of missiles to the precise location of the ship or fleet.


Countermeasures Won't Work


The simple truth is that countermeasures will work, but only for a while. US Navy has sophisticated countermeasures that include the Aegis antiballistic missile system, radar, and final protective lines of fire. These are all good systems, and effective at engaging individual incoming missiles. The problem is that they can be overwhelmed or confused by a massive barrage of incoming rounds. And even when they do work as planned, they only work while they have ammunition.


In other words, the Achilles' heel of every ship-borne system is that it is only effective as long as it has rounds to fire, which take up room on a ship and demand a lot of fuel to haul. So the farther we go from home base, the more expensive resupply becomes and the longer it takes. On the other hand, a land-based missile system can keep firing rounds indefinitely. In other words, all any nation has to do to destroy one of US most valuable military assets—our capital ships—is to keep firing missiles (no matter how cheap or inferior they are) until the ship runs out of the rounds needed to defend itself.



The Solution?


Los Angeles class nuclear-powered attack submarine


The solution is submarines. No matter how many satellites are in the sky, they cannot see below the ocean's surface. Nuclear-powered submarines can stay submerged for months on end. We need to exploit this capability and develop whole new classes of submarines, such as aircraft carriers, troop carriers, and cargo submarines.


Some of these suggestions may sound far-fetched. But during World War II, Japan actually built and deployed submarines with aircraft on board that were on their way across the Pacific to blow up the Panama Canal when the war ended. If it was possible to build such a submarine 60 years ago, why can we not do something similar or even better today?


Regarding assault ships, why can we not build submarines as troop carriers, then have them surface so Marines can deploy the last few hundred yards by inflatable raft or other small boats?


Cargo submarines could also be designed that open up for loading containerized shipping units or tactical vehicles. This cargo could be offloaded at piers using cranes, similar to how many surface ships are now loaded. Such submarines could be the only resupply line for heavy equipment if an enemy country or terrorist organization has eliminated our surface warships and is focusing now on our military cargo ships. (From JFQ)



Will future sea war unfold between subs only?

Poll Options ( single choice ) Number of participants 11  

1. Yes.
6 (54.55%)
2. No.
2 (18.18%)
3. Hard to say.
1 (9.09%)
4. Unclear.
2 (18.18%)

None
Visited forums

Friday, September 17, 2010

Enter the Dragon...

Dragon Enters into New World Order ---- or merely a Return to the Old?

Print

American dream waken by dragon

This topic has been highlight by szh at 2010-9-17 09:43.

American dream waken by dragon



The Dragon and the American Dream

By Dominic Tierney


Open your wallet and take out a one-dollar bill.


On one side you'll find an image of the Great Seal of the United States. There's a pyramid, with the eye of providence watching approvingly over our endeavors, the date 1776 (in Roman numerals), and the phrase Novus Ordo Seclorum. It means "A New Order of the Ages," signifying the beginning of the American era and a global revolution against tyrants.


You can put the bill away now, because a new order of the ages is emerging. It isn't an American era. It's a post-American era. For the first time since it entered the world stage, the United States is facing the emergence of a new great power rival. The rise of China challenges one of the most fundamental American beliefs: that history goes in one progressive direction.


The result could be a profound national identity crisis.


The Spanish-American War raised the curtain on the American century. When the drama began, the United States, Germany, Russia, Britain, France, and perhaps also Austria-Hungary and Japan, could all claim the hallowed status of being great powers. In the following decades, U.S. rivals exited the stage one by one, until America stood alone and unchallenged.


By 1939, on the eve of World War II, according to one measure, we were down to the final three, with the United States, the Soviet Union, and Germany towering over the other countries.


When the slaughter abated in 1945, Germany was devastated and divided, and only two great powers remained: the United States and the Soviet Union.


Then, after four decades of Cold War competition, the Soviet Union disintegrated, and the United States was the sole great power in the world.


It was like a season of Survivor, where America's rivals were voted off the island until the United States gained the prize of "Sole Survivor."


Americans are about to experience something new and profound. The United States will soon gain company as a great power. Just a few weeks ago, China surpassed Japan as the second largest economy in the world.  Certainly, on a per capita basis, China remains very poor. Overtaking Japan speaks as much to Japan's economic malaise as it does to China's spectacular growth. And of course, the wheels could suddenly come off the Chinese machine.


But if China's current growth continues, it will be a clear rival to the United States within a generation--and perhaps sooner. Using purchasing power parity rates, which take into account price differences, China could overtake the U.S. economy during the next decade.


This doesn't fit the American story. Just as disturbingly, China is not following the U.S. model of political, religious, and economic freedom--yet it succeeds all the same. And that's not all. If India and Brazil continue to rise, or if Europe and Japan enjoy an economic renaissance, there could be three or more great powers by 2050.


This doesn't fit the American story. Just as disturbingly, China is not following the U.S. model of political, religious, and economic freedom--yet it succeeds all the same. And that's not all. If India and Brazil continue to rise, or if Europe and Japan enjoy an economic renaissance, there could be three or more great powers by 2050.


During the American century, rivals were bested left and right, as the ranks of the great powers slipped from half-a-dozen, to three, to two, to one. Now history has stopped, and gone into reverse gear, with the number of great powers increasing from one to two, to three or more. The elite club could get crowded again, just like in 1898.


The rise of China will fundamentally challenge America's identity. History may not move in just one direction, after all. Perhaps the ancient Greeks were right. History is cyclical. The wheel turns. Nations rise and fall. If God watches over proceedings, he doesn't always intervene. Fools, drunks, and the United States of America cannot rely on special providence. One day their luck runs out.


How will this new and jarring experience affect Americans? The rise of China could prompt reflection and wisdom. Americans may seek to reinvent the United States, and thrive in a new world that is more complex but also laden with opportunity. Or the United States may respond as some great powers did in the past when facing a rising challenger--by lashing out. Perhaps Americans will copy the British, and find that the silver lining of relative decline is a new appreciation of dry humor and the irony of life.
1
0
TOP
Visited forums

Sunday, September 12, 2010

New military advantage? Quantum communication

China has fool-proof way of military communication

  This topic has been sticky by szh at 2010-9-12 12:46. 

Has China made a quantum leap forward?


China's new type of nuclear-powered submarines



Like a pair of male turkeys puffing up their chests at each other, the U.S. and Chinese militaries are back at it again,  engaging in tit-for-tat military exercises in the Yellow Sea. On Sept. 4, the Chinese navy finished live artillery maneuvers, using some of its newest planes, ships and battlefield weaponry in a publicly announced show of military strength. Though Chinese state media called the war games "routine," the timing of the event — just days before a scheduled U.S.-South Korea anti-submarine exercise in the same waters — suggests it's more likely an attempt to send the U.S. a simple message: This is our backyard.


After watching U.S.-led forces obliterate a Soviet-style Iraqi military in the first Gulf War, China realized it needed to improve its own outdated army. It has increased military expenditures every year for the past two decades. While Chinese officials called the relationship with the U.S. "stable" during talks in Beijing this week, given China's ambitions in the region, tensions between the two are sure to continue. Denny Roy, a senior fellow at the East-West Center in Honolulu, says China is "working towards a sphere of influence," and with their stronger military, they can now "send signals they couldn't before."


Thanks to a recent technological breakthrough, that's true literally, too. While China has been showing off its new hardware, a potentially more important military advancement has gone largely unnoticed: In May, Chinese scientists announced a demonstration of "quantum teleportation" over 16 kilometers (10 miles), creating what Matthew Luce, a researcher at the Defense Group Inc.'s Center for Intelligence Research and Analysis, calls "secure communications guaranteed by the laws of physics." China is now at the cutting-edge of military communications, transforming the field of cryptography and spotlighting a growing communications arms race.


Why is this superior to e-mail or radio? Because, theoretically, this method "cannot be cracked or intercepted," says Luce. If the photons in the laser beam are observed by a third party, the particles themselves will be altered due to a law of physics called the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which states that measuring a particle alters it. As such, the sender and receiver would be immediately informed that someone was snooping.


At the 16km distance tested, China would be able to send these secure messages from its network of satellites to units on the ground. Luce also says the choice of a blue laser — instead of an infrared one like the U.S. has been testing — was chosen with its growing submarine fleet in mind since blue lasers penetrate farther underwater. Soon, Chinese satellites could be able to communicate with submarines without them needing to surface or give away their location by breaking radio silence. This may sound like science-fiction, but quantum encryption is already used by a few banks and governments for highly sensitive information on a smaller scale.


No one claims that the Chinese military will surpass the U.S.' anytime soon, but it isn't just dueling naval exercises that will determine pecking order. It's also how fast China can integrate the newest technologies into its military, maintaining its strengths like cyber-warfare while improving the PLA's precision, coordination and secrecy.  (From Time)

Thursday, September 9, 2010

The Sane Way to Deal with China in Asia

A sane way to learn to share --- especially what isn't your



China is asserting its economic and strategic primacy in Asia, at a time when the vulnerabilities in the American economy, are highlighted by recession and US defence resources stretched by fighting terrorism and the war in Afghanistan.
One of Australia's leading defence analysts says a Chinese challenge to American power in Asia is already happening.





(Presenter: Sen Lam



Speaker: Hugh White, Professor of Strategic Studies at the Australian National University and author of the Quarterly Essay, 'Power Shift - Australia's Future Between Washington & Beijng')





LAM: When you say Australia needs to prepare for a more dangerous region, is that directly related to China's rise?



WHITE: Well yes but not because China itself necessarily I think poses a threat as it becomes more powerful. I think for Australia, and indeed for Asia as a whole, the last few decades have been unusually good because Asia's strategic order has been so stable, and I think that's mainly been because the relations between Asia's strongest states, the US, China and Japan, have not been competitive. I do think we're now moving into an era in which those relationships are going to be more competitive, particularly between China and the United States, and that the way in which that competition plays out could have very big implications for everyone, including Australia. I think though whether or not that ends up playing out violently or peacefully will depend not just on China and how China uses its strength, but also on how the rest of us responds. So I think it's not just a matter that China's growing power might pose a threat, but the way in which the rest of us respond may also destabilise the region.





LAM: So would you go as far as to side with some US proponents of the China containment policy?



WHITE: No I wouldn't, I think that is the way to guarantee that Asia ends up becoming a less stable, more dangerous than it's been in the past. I think it's extremely important that as China's power grows we do whatever we can within appropriate limits to accommodate China's growing power, to recognise that it's growing economic power means that it will play a bigger leadership role in the region. To accept that up to a point at least that's legitimate, and I think the core of it is that those biggest states, particularly the US and China have to learn to treat one another as equals. And I think that's going to be a very difficult thing for America to do, but very important that America should find a way to do it.





LAM: And do you think that there are signs that America is already doing that, treating China as an equal?



WHITE: No I don't unfortunately, I think the signs are that as Chinese power grows I think the US is to a certain extent in denial. It hopes and expects and intends, I think you might say is determined to preserve its primacy, preserve the kind of leadership it's exercised in Asia over the last few decades, even as China's power approaches it and may indeed in the not too distant future, overtake America's. And I think that's a very significant issue, and I think it's something that countries in Asia have to reflect on. Do we want America to try and preserve primacy, to try and constrain China to a subordinate position, or do we want the United States to learn to work with China as an equal as China's power grows?





LAM: And you don't think that the US might review its policy in light of the shifting economic balance?



WHITE: I have seen very little sign of that so far. I think Americans hope that their present economic problems will pass, and I think they mistakenly believe that it's their economic problems rather than China's economic strength which constitutes the primary underlying shift in the balance between them. And I think that's a mistake. I don't think in the end it's America's current problems which constitute the change in the strategic balance between the US and China, but China's growth, and I think China's growth will continue, and I think America hasn't yet recognised that it's going need to adapt to that. And I think they will need to.





LAM: So if China is already challenging American power in Asia, what should Australia be doing?



WHITE: Well I think this poses Australia a very deep choice, do we support the United States if it decides to contest China's challenge to its primacy, or do we encourage the United States to move forward to a different kind of role in Asia, to stay engaged in Asia, actively engaged in Asia but not to dominate but to balance and share? Now I think Australia should do the latter, I think Australia should say to the United States we don't think you should try and dominate Asia as China grows. We think you should stay engaged, but not as the uncontested leader, but as one of a collective leadership, which also includes China. Now that would be a very difficult idea for Australians to get their heads around, we've always welcomed American leadership in Asia as essential to our security, so for us to encourage America to forego that would be a very big step. But I think the alternative to see ourselves drawn at America's side into an increasingly contested relationship with our biggest trading partner. And that doesn't seem like a good idea for anybody. (ABC Radio Australia)

11

UID1814 Posts427 Digest0 Credits4164 Fame1024 Money1654 Permission90 Online35 hours Registered2010-4-13 Last login2010-9-9 Profile

TOP





‹‹ Previous
Next ›› Visited forums

Comments and suggestionsToday's worldChinese defenceCultural bridgePeople ForumToday's worldProfile of ChinaFocus discussionOdds & TidbitsComments and suggestionsCultural bridgeChinese defenceOnline chats & interviewsOnline debates & pollsCurrent time zone GMT+8, now is 2010-9-9 19:00



Clear Cookies - Contact Us - People's Daily Online - Archiver - TOP

Friday, September 3, 2010

Rant (school is not what it used to be)

School is not what it used to be and I am not the dutiful #1 son I was years ago...

Here online I encounter faceless students in the pursuit of knowledge, truth, and wisdom...

The following is a transcript and a rant...


Hi Cory,




You are the sanest guy in the class. I have dropped out and out of school. Actually I was forced out. I will explain in another email.



I will be glad to work with you on poetry and discuss the notions of mental illness. You are a true investigator.



First I want to copy this letter I sent to Professor Roxanne Kurtz, for it illustrates something about me and about my realities.



Hope you can understand. I will be glad to help with whatever I can at no charge. Just email me whenever. My phone is 206-329-5566 in Seattle.



Best wishes,

Koon



Dear Professor Roxanne Kurtz,



It is a very long story how UIS has treated me. But if you are interested I could write a tome and publish it somewhere and send you a copy. Do you want me to do that or should I just die in peace?



If you are sincerely interested in justice with a small "j" then perhaps I could take the time from my precarious life to explain. Remember that while writing papers is a way to make a living for you, it is a way to decrease my chances of surviving at this point. This all sounds very cryptic. I suggest that you have a private chat with Professor Bill Kline and with the Disability advisor Suzy Woods, if you are so inclined, to understand where I am coming from. I come from everywhere - something that insulated academicians are not privy to know first hand.



Now as far as this jerk Kenshin is concerned, I merely used the Socratic method on him. Since he treated me like an idiot and behaved toward me belligerently (although in philosophic verbosity), I behaved similarly in return, but I was born a village boy, and I shall always behave like a village boy, when my integrity or livelihood is threatened.



I, as a matter of fact, if you review the posts carefully, make overtures of friendship toward him. He spurn my offer of comradship and friendship and colleagueship because he had some preconceived notion that he was the most superior. (The copious number of his postings indicated that he must have the last and final word on anything). I even used humor to defuse the tension he had with me and others but he interpreted it the wrong way, out of egotism. He obviously has a fragile ego. I, on the other hand, do not claim to be wiser or stronger in my self-esteem, but I know where I am coming from. I lay my hand out for all to see. I am who I claim to be. You can know more about me by Googling "Koon Woon poetry" or log onto http://clsseattle.blogspot.com or http://koonwoon.blogspot.com or get a copy of my published book of poems THE TRUTH IN RENTED ROOMS from Kaya, NY, NY, 1998, which had won the Pen Oakland Award and was a finalist in the Norma Farber First Book Prize from the Poetry Society of America. It has also been used as a text at several universities and colleges including UC Santa Cruz and Sarah Lawrence. It sits at over 70 universities in the US and Canada as well as in city libraries, including Yale, Columbia, Berkeley, Stanford, et al.



My posts about the world situation has been printed online in the People's Daily for the entire world to see. We are at a very critical time in history and this is no time for petty "arguments" in philosophy for an ivory tower position to refute the world, as what I presume Kenshin wants to be headed. Book learning is fine, but silly rules have retarded many otherwise bright school boys. Consider where I am coming from.



I was born in 1949 in a village in China without electricity or running water and I did not speak my first word of English until I was 12.



I have been homeless 3 times due to mental illness. I have been illegally evicted, jailed, and hospitalized and assaulted. This I take it to be my luck. But what I don't take lightly is my responsibility to the Overseas Chinese immigrants as I am the leader of the Locke clan (I am a cousin of Gary Locke, the Commerce Secretary under Obama). I am a member of the Triad (not the Mafia but the honor society). I have risked my life to protected the welfare and well being of the otherwise helpless immigrants. I have written for them. My second book should be out this year from Kaya called WATER CHASING WATER. It will be marketed in the world's most populous 25 countries, including China and even Russia.



So, who is Kenshin? He said that he treats everyone equally. He does not seem to have any empathy for anyone with a checkered history. And I did study with John Wisdom at the University of Oregon when I was 22, the time the CIA tried to recruit me.



But I just had come back from Wisconsin this past Sunday where an elderly lady friend of my wife and me may have been dying. I am human, and only human, as you so kindly pointed out to Kenshin in his "standards (read "intolerance") of others. I was in no mood for personal attacks no matter what language and what pretext it was in. I fight fire with fire and I fight water with water. That is something people should understand of "village boys." And remember, 70% of China's 1.3 people are village people and the Chinese Army is 2.5 million Village Boys, armed with nuclear bombs and missiles. This is what I am really talking about and about the "US-Sout Korean Naval Exercises" off China in the Yellow Sea.



If you want to know more I can tell you plenty. But for now, I really don't know much for certain. Only that in the interest of epistemology and metaphysics the US public media should be more forthright and open about our hegemony and drive for world domination. I can only say this to you. I am trained in the martial arts. We do not attack unless first attacked. And that includes verbally. But when we do respond, we go "overboard," as others describe us.



I have finished ranting. But please do consider that I am a disabled person. And in all sincerity, I am a "teddy bear." I dedicated my forthcoming book to my 87 year old friend Betty Irene Priebe and all the money to her brain-damaged granddaughter Ellie Priebe. I worked 13 years on this book. (the last one took 17 years, and so there was improvement). And Roxanne, I sincerely wish to be "kinder and gentler" if we weren't on the verge of extinction. No time to talk nicely when your house is on fire and some salesman is trying to sell you a cigarette lighter.



There, now you should know that I am mentally ill. The state has kept records of it for the past 34 years. I hope that you understand that I am a weak man and a fragile person. But because "of a little lack" as Henri Michaux the French poet wrote, "my hopes go way up, to infinity almost."



From what little I know of you, and I am a fairly good judge of people, you are fair minded and measured in your judgment and nice in your advice. I don't mind being the Idiot and the Nut, just so long as Kenshin will know that people like me exist in the world, and there might come a time on Skid Road, when all the academic philosophy and Sophist tongue, will not talk his way out of an addict bent on murdering him for an angry fix of dope...



Yours respectfully,

Koon Woon



This is not meant to be a threat to anyone. I done my defense. It is only verbal.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Kurtz, Roxanne Marie

Sent: Tue 8/31/2010 7:36 PM

To: Woon, Koon

Subject: PHI472





Koon,

Although I see you have dropped PHI472, I would be remiss if I did not ask you to please keep in mind though that calling another student "idiot" in a public forum really is not OK. In future, the better path is to take concerns about other students directly to the professor privately.

All best,

Roxanne





Roxanne Marie Kurtz

Assistant Professor of Philosophy

University of Illinois at Springfield

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

The Misty Poets revisited

With war tensions high between China and the US in the Pacific Ocean's Yellow and South China Seas, where the US seeks to contain China, I think it is appropriate to revisit the Misty Poets of the 1980's in China and exiled beyond for their poetry's relevance. I have two brief reviews (essays) to post:


The “Misty Poets” from a Historical Perspective






A long time ago in high school mathematics, we learned a technique in “linear programming” to maximize a variable while minimizing another one. This is the minimax or the maxmin problem. One of the applications of this technique is investing in stocks. Let’s say Investor X has an S amount of money she wants to invest in the stock market. How should she invest the money if she wants to be safe about it in the sense that regardless of what’s happening in the world, her investment will be “protected” even though it is possibly not the most lucrative of investment portfolios.



She would invest equally in Peace and she would invest in War.



For example, she would invest in Dow Chemicals and Boeing or Lockheed in case that there is war and these companies would then profit from war by making weapons. On the other hand, if the world was at peace, she would benefit more from luxury goods such as cosmetics and tourism businesses in companies such as Proctor and Gamble, Starbucks Coffee, and Northwest Airlines. And so either way, her investments are “protected.”



This seems to be the approach China is taking with domestic investments and its foreign polices with the rest of the world. China is investing in peace as well as in war. By strengthening its defense, it is securing its domestic and foreign investments. The realistic understanding of the meaning of “property” is that property isn’t what is in your name, but what you can protect. Witness the oil in Iraq and the reasons we are in Iraq and I don’t think I need to say any more on this score nor should I say any more about vast buying of arms by Saudi Arabia.



It is a long way to get to the Misty Poets from this economic and military angle but I will get there eventually and explain why the Misty Poets came into being, and why they were tolerated for a while, flourished, and then squashed, and exiled, and forced into suicide.



We need to really go back to ancient history in China with the Music Bureau in the early dynasties, but for our discussion, we will merely go back to the complacency of China’s imperial past until the Manchu Invasion and the subsequent occupation by foreign Western Powers which notably was highlighted by the Opium Wars some 150 years ago.



China had such a difficult time to kick out all the foreign powers, imperialist Japan, and to engage in a civil war of its own, and then to help fight two major border wars (Korea and Vietnam) since 1950, because as Jean Follain had written, Southeast Asia is the “warm belly of Asia.” By this he means the food production capabilities of Indochina as the French were in Vietnam one time and learned the lesson that it cannot stop the yearning of a people to be free of foreign domination. When the US-Vietnam war concluded, this is where our analysis of the Misty Poets begins.



In 1972, US President Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger made a secret trip to China and secretly agreed to end the Vietnam war and to normalize relations with China.

Deng Hsiao Ping, the Paramount Leader of China, came to Texas and sported a cowboy hat and the television sequel “Kungfu” became a hit. And an era of “ping-pong diplomacy” began. China introduced limited capitalism into its economy and worked “miracles,” so that 30 years later, it becomes the 4th largest economy of world, and it is predicted by the Economist that it will be the biggest economy of the world by 2020, just 12 years away.



However, with the introduction of limited capitalism in China, a sort of freewheeling capitalist entrepreneurial class developed in its cities, so that within a span of 30 years, it spawned great “wealth” and created a deep division between “the have it” and “the have not’s.” The Chinese government for a time experimented with individual freedoms and liberal attitudes for a short while, and so a group of writers and poets clustered around Bei Dao and his experimental magazine “Today,” and wrote poetry in what is known as

”Misty Poetry,” in which strange, surreal, and indirect ways were used to criticize the excesses of the Cultural Revolution in the past and the lack of complete bourgeois freedom that these writers sought.



Much of the poetry of the “Misty Poets” was a kind of self-indulgence and complaint about the Chinese censorship. They were tolerated for a while but once the authorities realized where this kind of writing was going, they cracked down on it, culminating in the Tien An Men Massacre.



Bei Dao himself was out of the country at the time and so he chose exile. Some of the poets were imprisoned and some where exiled and a couple in exile committed suicide. Shu Ting, the most distinguished woman poet of this group, never left China. And I think her reasons are very mature and laudable. I will just include one poem by her, which in my mind, is the most mature and telling of why she never left China and is imminently loved outside of China as well as she is in China:



Perhaps



- reply to the loneliness of a poet



Perhaps our hearts

will have no reader

Perhaps we took the wrong road

and so we end up lost



Perhaps we light one lantern after another

storms blew them out one by one

Perhaps once we’re out of tears

the land will be fertilized

Perhaps while we praise the sun

we are also sung by the sun



Perhaps the heavier the money on our shoulders

the more we believe

Perhaps we can only protest others’ suffering

silent to our own misfortune

Perhaps

Because this call is irresistible

we have no other choice





December, 1979 Tr. Tony Barnstone



Note: Shu Ting was only 27 when she wrote this poem.



Koon Woon, March 15, 2008

_________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Koon Woon (Poetry 2010) on the Misty Poets


Out of the Howling Storm, Ed. Tony Barnstone, Wesleyan University Press 1993





Actually one can draw a parallel between the birth of Beat poetry in the US in the 1950’s and the rise of the Misty Poets in China in the decade of the 1980’s culminating in the Tien An Men Massacre. The parallel that can be drawn is of course the reaction to a faceless, mass, and authoritarian culture. The reason why the United States was so conformist in the 1950’s is still poorly understood, at least by me, but I can understand why it was so in China for many decades since the founding of the PRC.



Mao Tse-Tung had urged writers and artists to serve the cause of the revolution in his famous “Talks at the Yenan Forum on Literature and Art” in May, 1942. He said that along the military front to push out invaders from China and to liberate the proletariat and the masses from oppression by counter-revolutionary forces, the writers and artists must help the new Chinese nation by educating and uniting the masses as a component of the “revolutionary machine.”



In the ensuing years, Mao kept his power until his death in 1976, but during the times he faced disloyalty and complaints of his mistakes, he variously called out the Red Guards and instigated the Cultural Revolution to build a new base of power founded on the younger people, teenagers.



Bei Dao, the foremost proponent of Misty poetry, which was a term later given to it by its critics for being obscure had been a red guard and was re-educated by construction work. He started the influential underground literary magazine, Today, in Beijing in 1979, which operated for 2 years until it was banned. Here the poets wrote poems obliquely criticizing the authoritarian mass culture of China by using fantastic images and obscure language and syntactical innovations. His most famous poem, “Answer” contains the following lines and stanzas in part:



The scoundrel carries his baseness around like an ID card

The honest man bears his honor like an epitaph.

Look – the gilded sky is swimming

with undulant reflections of the dead.



…..



Listen. I don’t believe!

OK. You’ve trampled

a thousand enemies underfoot. Call me

a thousand and one.



I don’t believe the sky is blue.

I don’t believe what the thunder says.

I don’t believe dreams aren’t real,

that beyond death there is no reprisal.



….



I think the line “I don’t believe what the thunder says” refers to the revolutionary doctor turned writer, Lu Hsun, who wrote “In the Stillness of Mountains/Hear the peal of Thunder.” (Thunder is the English word for Lu Hsun’s name).Whereas Lu Hsun served the revolution with his writings, Bei Dao is calling for a literature of the individual.



Even though Bei Dao has been nominated several times for the Nobel, I do not think that his poetry is of that caliber. It is a fetish of the Western World to elevate anything that is critical of modern China, witness the uncritical homage paid to the Dalai Lama, who actually is the head of a theocracy, which the US Constitution itself advocates the separation of Church and State, and thus it is a little hypocritical in this stance, although it is not necessarily true that China treats the Tibetan as well as they treat the Han Chinese, but that’s no different from how the whites treat the blacks in the US.



Yang Lian is another one of the original Misty Poets who now teaches university in New Zealand. His poetry is more lyrical and less strident than Bei Dao’s. In most ways, it is less nihilistic than the whole lot of the Misty Poets. In the poem “Sowing,” he is more concerned with the future generations and seemed to have benefited from being sent to the countryside during the Cultural Revolution. [I have known several people personally who had been sent to the countryside living now in the United States and I did not detect any real hatred for this experience from this limited sample]. Yang Lian writes:



I dreamt I was a shuddering field of wheat,

ripe, swaying like a thousand suns,

and even the hot winds were golden,

calmly singing me

a delicate song

soft as an ancient smile,

like a blurred blessing from afar.



Let my desires spill over

and my love be sown. (refrain)



Bury me deep in the warm earth

and let my blood flow into underground rivers

to water shriveled hearts

from the miserable past.

I am a seed where life has hibernated,

a green burning vitally…



There is a feeling of redemption here of the past pains. His lyrics are so beautiful; I cannot help from quoting another portion of it:



I am proud to be close to the earth;

Even when winter stars are frozen over or under snowdrifts

I think of the coming hope of spring

and the next sure harvest;

after the growing pains

I now know that joy is in faith

And my only duty is to create abundance…



I will end this short commentary with another poet, whom I think is the most remarkable of this group of Misty Poets, who came to be modern Chinese poets sort of like water that has flown to sea and comes back during the high tide to the river. The Chinese literature that was carried out of China like its pottery and imitated by the Dutch comes back with the European ideals of individualism, romanticism, and political freedom, but also with a sense of nihilism and this is acknowledged and echoed by Shu Ting, but her reaction is mature for she knows the burden of the poet when she wrote in “Perhaps,” at the remarkable age of 27, and having only a middle-school education, the following lines which I quote:



Perhaps our hearts

will have no reader

Perhaps we took the wrong road

and so we end up lost



And this was the reply to the loneliness of a poet, which she ends the poem with:



Perhaps the heavier the monkey on our shoulders

the more we believe

Perhaps we can only protest other’s suffering

silent to our own misfortune

Perhaps

because this call is irresistible

we have no choice



December, 1979



It was not surprising that when she was only in her 30’s, twice she was the top woman poet in all of China, loved by the world in and out of China. She gives me hope that the greatest talents are not self-seeking, but cast their lot with humanity.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Betty

I am happy to say that Betty, though resting in a hospital, is comfortable at the moment. Only time can tell what will be.

Reconsideration of WATER CHASING WATER

Truth and Reality sometimes fluctuate, depending. I reconsider my position with regards to my book to be published by Kaya. My state of mind is not always the same and not always sound. Be that what it may, here is my decision to work with Kaya again to have my book WATER CHASING WATER published.

Dear Koon:




Thanks for this information. Please give my best to Betty. We'll be

sure to amend this information in the book, and send you an amendment

to the contract as well.



Best,

Sunyoung

On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:55 PM, Nooknoow@aol.com wrote:



>

> Sunyoung Lee

> Kaya Press

> Muae Publishing

>

>

> Dear Sunyoung,

>

> I sincerely apologize for my previous communication to cut off all

> communications. I was under a lot of stress which were unjust in my

> opinion to me.

> I am presently at Waukesha, Wisconsin visiting Betty Priebe who is

> now at age 87 and very ill. I wish to dedicate my book WATER CHASING

> WATER to her and so I wish to be reconsidered and to renegotiate its

> publication by Kaya. Since you have already paid me an advance of

> $500, that should earn Kaya the right to publish it. The only

> further requirement I have is that the book shall be dedicated to

> Betty Priebe with the following exact inscription: "This book is

> dedicated to my dear friend Betty Irene Priebe."

>

> I also wish to assign all my rights of monetary returns, now or

> forever hence, to Ellie Priebe, the granddaughter of Betty Irene

> Priebe. Please have this in legal language. I also wish to assign

> all my rights to any future monetary returns from my book THE TRUTH

> IN RENTED ROOMS to Ellie Priebe.

>

> I attest that I am sound of mind and not under duress and today's

> date is August 27, 2010, and that this offer is legally binding. A

> copy of this email is being sent to Laura Priebe and to Rebecca

> Evans.

>

> [signed] Koon Woon

> August 27, 2010

> Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA

Monday, August 23, 2010

IDENTITY OF WRITERS -- is there a Chinese American literature? An exploratory question.

IDENTITY OF WRITERS

Identity of writers




August 23, 2010



My wife watches a lot of movies and I almost never do. She asked me what I wanted to see so that we can see a movie together. So, we order Roshomon by Akira Kurosawa which was a crime story told by several perspectives. Essentially it was the rape of a Japanese woman and the murder of her Samurai husband told by 4 points of view. This is purported to say that truth is relative or that “objectivity” is to be questioned. However, knowing Kurosawa’s political point of view, I would rather say that this is a film about identity. It is the disruption of a culture – namely the Samurai culture of Japan by whatever forces this crime depicts. To me, it is the gunboat politics of Commodore Perry. One may differ with me of course and he or she is welcome to do so.

IDENTITY -- a fundamental property of all things

Identity --- that which resists annihilation, is a fundamental property and the drive of all things to remain what they are.



A writer is someone who has an identity. Who is the writer? Is he an ink fish that spews ink to hide himself or is he someone that really comes through as a point of view of a sector of reality?



Who does the writer purport to represent and is he really honest about it? One does not become a serious reader without taking the writer's identity into consideration.



Truth is a modal notion. Some people would argue that truth is absolute, that the truth is the same of all time and of all places. Others argue that truth is of this time and of this place. This is what is meant by the modal proposition “in what mode is this proposition true?” Or, in other words, in what context is an expression or a statement true? Or, more broadly, in what possible worlds, can an event or an occurrence of something be realized?



Speaking in this vein, it is easy to see that the notion of identity enters into the discussion of truth. That is to say, whose truth? The writer often speaks or purports to or pretends to speak the truth. Supposedly, journalism as a profession is more truthful than books of fiction.



There are all kinds of writers and there are all kinds of works written. Since identity is such an intractable subject, I will use it in a very narrow and specific sense as it applies to literature, in the old-fashioned definition of the word. Literature is the study of life. To this end, I require that the writer at least metaphorically speak the truth about life.



Since it is the task of philosophy to assume very little, I will assume that despite the claim that an Chinese-American literature exists and is perhaps thriving, I want to make an investigation into it whether this is so, to what extent can we say that a genuine Chinese-American literature exists and not a mere isomorphic copy of the dominant American literature that is large white and middle-class. I will also argue that to be a genuine “minority” literature that writing has to have an identity outside that of the mainstream writing, often at odds with it, and it must rise above itself to include the mainstream literature to achieve “universality.” It is like the Native American saying: you drew a circle to keep me out, and I drew a larger circle to keep you in.













Koon Woon

Seattle, WA

Sunday, August 22, 2010

IDENTITY -- a fundamental property of all things

Identity --- that which resists annihilation, is a fundamental property and the drive of all things to remain what they are.

A writer is someone who has an identity. Who is the writer? Is he an inkfish that espews ink to hide himself or is he someone that really comes through as a point of view of a sector of reality?

Who does the writer purport to represent and is he really honest about it? One does not become a serious reader without taking the writer's identity into consideration.

                                     Hmmm, I wonder, muses the cat, if I am who I am and what
                                             I think I see out there is really what is out there...

An old diary piece by Koon Woon

  January 28, 2010 I believe this Journal idea is a sane idea and will help keep me in this class, school, and in life itself. 6:10AM ...